파일명 뒤에 's' 가 붙은 자료가 로고가 없는 자료입니다~!
※ 타 카페 / 블로그에 무단 전제를 금합니다.
※ 오타가 있을 수 있습니다.
※ PDF로만 파일을 제공합니다.
알쌤의 영어교실 블로그 http://blog.naver.com/forjr
알파카의 영어농장 [만덕영어학원] : 네이버 블로그
무능한 선생만 있을뿐, 무능한 학생은 없다
blog.naver.com
유튜브 채널 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4odtcensF2XNDb51dvZofw
알파카의영어농장
학생들과 호흡하며 수업을 진행하다보니 때로는 느슨한 호흡으로 진행할 수 밖에 없는 점 양해부탁드립니다. 교과 어휘 및 본문 자료, 모의고사 관련 변형 등 관련 자료는 영어농장 카페를 통해
www.youtube.com
32. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.
Great scientists are seldom one-hit wonders. Newton is a prime example: beyond the Newtonian mechanics, he developed the theory of gravitation, calculus, laws of motion, and optimization. In fact, well-known scientists are often involved in multiple discoveries, a phenomenon potentially explained by the Matthew effect. Indeed, an initial success may offer a scientist legitimacy, improve peer perception, provide knowledge of how to score and win, enhance social status, and attract resources and quality collaborators, each of these payoffs further increasing her odds of scoring another win. Yet, there is an appealing alternative explanation: Great scientists have multiple hits and consistently succeed in their scientific endeavors simply because they’re exceptionally talented. Therefore, future success again goes to those who have had success earlier, not because of advantages offered by the previous success, but because the earlier success was indicative of a hidden talent. The Matthew effect posits that success alone increases the future probability of success, raising the question: Does status dictate outcomes, or does it simply reflect an underlying talent or quality? In other words, is there really a Matthew effect after all?
*posit:상정하다
33. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.
When we realize we’ve said something in error and we pause to go back to correct it, we stop gesturing a couple of hundred milliseconds before we stop speaking. Such sequences suggest the startling notion that our hands “know” what we’re going to say before our conscious minds do, and in fact this is often the case. Gesture can mentally prime a word so that the right term comes to our lips. When people are prevented from gesturing, they talk less fluently; their speech becomes halting because their hands are no longer able to supply them with the next word, and the next. Not being able to gesture has other deleterious effects: without gesture to help our mental processes along, we remember less useful information, we solve problems less well, and we are less able to explain our thinking. Far from tagging along as speech’s clumsy companion, gesture represents the leading edge of our thought.
*startling:놀라운**deleterious:해로운
34. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.
Despite the difference between the past and the future, between what has happened and what is to come, it can be suggested, that our sense of the past has always been influenced by our view of the future. Revolutionaries have always looked to the past to frame their future cause, as is amply illustrated by examples from nationalism to communism. The future has often been seen as variously a recovery of a lost time, as a replication of what is established, or as a model bequeathed by a heroic age long gone. The writing of history is based on understanding or explaining future outcomes that were not known to contemporaries, since the historian has the benefit of hindsight and the past is nothing more than the accumulation of futures that are now our past. So, rather than see the hand of the past always shaping the future, perhaps it can be seen in reverse, with the past ━ in the sense of our understanding of it ━ being shaped by our orientation to the future.
*replication:복제**bequeath:후세에 전하다***hindsight:(지난 일에 대한) 통찰력
35. 다음 글에서 전체 흐름과 관계 없는 문장은?
Dictionaries are relatively good resources for anyone interested in finding out what a word means. Using one set of words to define another word is called a lexical definition. But it’s important to understand the limits of dictionary definitions.More often than not, a definition in a dictionary requires readers to have a fairly robust understanding of the language already at their disposal. In other words, a dictionary functions in many cases as a crossreference or translator between words one knows and words that one doesn’t yet know. Even the most obscure words in a dictionary, say, for example, “pulchritudinous” or “kalokagathia,” must be defined using words that the reader already knows and understands. Otherwise, the dictionary isn’t very helpful.
*lexical:어휘적인**robust:탄탄한***obscure:난해한
36. 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.
The governments of virtually every country on the planet attach great importance to achieving food security and a wide variety of mechanisms have been developed to realize this goal. The first issue governments face in achieving national food security is the problem of insuring that adequate amounts of food are available to the resident population. Some governments have set goals of food selfsufficiency, which means most if not all of the food available in a country comes from the domestic farming system. However, food security does not require food self-sufficiency because countries can import food items not easily produced within the country. Agricultural products are, after all, highly sensitive to climatic, soil and other conditions that tend to vary around the world. Even countries with extremely productive agricultural sectors are not fully selfsufficient in all food items. The United States, for example, depends on imports for its supply of coffee, tea, bananas and other tropical products. In general, the problem of assuring adequate food supplies is solved by relying on both domestic production and imports.
37. 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.
Stress not only affects physical disease but also the very structure of our brains, making us even more likely to experience a drained brain. A number of studies have been done to reveal what happens in healthy people’s brains when they go through something stressful. One study demonstrated a link between a smaller hippocampus and people who had experienced longlasting stress. Why does this matter? This part of the brain helps you remain resilient in the face of stress and is involved in mood regulation. It also helps you to monitor the safety of your environment and store dangerous images in your long-term memory so you can avoid them in the future. It does all these things as part of its duties of regulating your sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. But chronic stress can confuse the hippocampus and lead to turning signals for cortisol “on” instead of “off,” which can trap you in a constant state of fight, flight, or freeze.
*resilient:회복력이 있는**(para)sympathetic:(부)교감***hippocampus:(대뇌 측두엽의) 해마
38. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳을 고르시오.
It is important to recognize that although science is a rule-based procedure, it is very much a creative process. A conjecture is a philosophical invention, cooked up rather mystically by the mind through the mental computation we call careful contemplation. However, until the hypothesis is tested against reality, it is not yet truly knowledge; it is just information that represents speculation. Knowledge is information that has demonstrated its usefulness. It is what is left over after cycles of experimental testing have eliminated false theories. As scientists continually test their hypotheses and modify their models to account for new and surprising data, a kind of “learning loop” emerges that statisticians call Bayesian updating. Based on Bayes’ Rule, developed by eighteenthcentury English statistician and philosopher Thomas Bayes, Bayesian updating refers to a mathematical process whereby an accepted theory or predictive model gets increasingly accurate through the repetitive testing of competing variants of that theory.
*conjecture:추론**contemplation:숙고***speculation:추측
39. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳을 고르시오.
As a general rule, it’s better if your definition corresponds as closely as possible to the way in which the term is ordinarily used in the kinds of debates to which your claims are pertinent. There will be, however, occasions where it is appropriate, even necessary, to coin special uses through what philosophers call stimulative definition. This would be the case where the current lexicon is not able to make distinctions that you think are philosophically important. For example, we do not have a term in ordinary language that describes a memory that is not necessarily a memory of something the person having it has experienced. Such a thing would occur, for example, if I could somehow share your memories: I would have a memorytype experience, but this would not be of something that I had actually experienced. To call this a memory would be misleading. For this reason, philosophers have coined the special term ‘quasimemory’ to refer to these hypothetical memorylike experiences.
*pertinent:관련 있는
40. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?
Quite often the interaction between groups is socially unequal, and this is reflected in the fact that in many cases borrowing of words or constructions goes mostly or entirely in one direction, from the more powerful or prestigious group to the less favored one. The languages of socially subordinated groups may from quite an early period of contact provide terminology for objects or practices with which speakers of the more powerful group were previously unfamiliar, but the effects of contact in that direction may not progress any further than this. In some cases, as with the Dharug language of Sydney, Australia, the source of some of the earliest loans from Indigenous Australian languages into English, the fate of the language system is extinction after the obliteration of many of its speakers. The remainder shifted to varieties of English, the language of the people who had suppressed them.
*prestigious:권력을 가진**subordinate:종속된***obliteration:소멸
Language borrowing from dominant to subordinate groups reflects social (A)inequality, where the language systems of the latter often (B)vanish even though they may have provided some terms, as exemplified by Dharug in Australia.
[41-42] 다음 글을 읽고, 물음에 답하시오.
In 1900, at the close of the first decade in which electric systems had become a practical alternative for manufacturers, less than 5 percent of the power used in factories came from electricity. But the technological advances of suppliers made electric systems and electric motors ever more affordable and reliable, and the suppliers’ intensive marketing programs also sped the adoption of the new technology. Further accelerating the shift was the rapid expansion in the number of skilled electrical engineers, who provided the expertise needed to install and run the new systems. In short order, electric power had gone from exotic to commonplace.
But one thing didn’t change. Factories continued to build their own power-supply systems on their own premises. Few manufacturers considered buying electricity from the small central stations. Designed to supply lighting to local homes and shops, the central stations had neither the size nor the skill to serve the needs of big factories. And the factory owners, having always supplied their own power, were loath to assign such a critical function to an outsider. They knew that a glitch in power supply would bring their operations to a halt ━ and that a lot of glitches might well mean bankruptcy. As the new century began, a survey found that there were already 50,000 private electric plants in operation, far surpassing the 3,600 central stations.
*premises:(공장) 부지**glitch:(작은) 결함
'2025 모의고사 자료' 카테고리의 다른 글
2025년 3월 고2 모의고사 [좌본우해/어휘정리/어휘테스트] (0) | 2025.04.08 |
---|---|
2025년 3월 고1 모의고사 [한줄해석/영작연습/해석연습] (0) | 2025.04.08 |
2025년 3월 고1 모의고사 [좌본우해/어휘정리/어휘테스트] (0) | 2025.04.08 |